The New Christians has a few good moments in the middle. Nevertheless, there remains an overall tone of "superiority". Yet, what does one expect from The New Christians. That is, whenever we hear or read New... we could easily insert "and improved."
Now, it may be that something is new and improved. For instance who can argue that new methods of anesthetizing are not an improvement over a belt of scotch followed by biting down on a handkerchief. Yet, I am not convinced that three blades on my razor while new is an actual improvement over the straight-razor. Not only is it more expensive and disposable but it lacks cinematic value. No battered housewife is going to find a safety razor a ready weapon against her demented, unrelenting spouse.
With respect to the Emergent community, the term New as in A New Kind of Christian seems to against the grain of the movement. That is, Tony Jones continuously asserts that the Emergent community strives to be non-judgmental but the term New implies a judgement, a judgement on the Old. In McLaren's book, the dialogue tries to soften this judgement. We are not saying we are better, just "New."
Anyway, I can't wait to see how this new Emergent "denomination" matures. As for me, if I want good liturgy, I'll head off to an Anglican compline. If I want good music, I'll put in a CD...maybe, a little Zeppelin or Mahalia Jackson. If I want to go to a church where a different person leads communion every week, I'll keep going to the Brethren rooted church I attend here in Vancouver.
If the Emergent movement wants to borrow from all the old institutions and claim they are doing something New. They might want to look at the fate of the New Coke.
Still, if you want to read a brief history of the Emergent church and get a feel for the movement and its adherents. The New Christians by Tony Jones is a good place to start and a relatively quick read. Yet, in the end, like most apologetic works, Tony Jones has written a book for Emergent people that won't be particularly persuasive to those of us who get It but don't really want It.
IP:ip
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Saturday, February 16, 2008
The New Christians and the Death of the Church
I picked up The New Christians by Tony Jones because of the title. Yes, it is reminiscent of Brian McLaren's A New Kind of Christian and intentionally so. Tony Jones begins by giving us the background of the Emergent movement. It is a bit of an Acts of the Emergent Apostles according to Tony Jones. Frankly, it reads a bit like The Celestine Prophecy as Tony Jones and the other Apostles come to terms with this strange new understanding they have and other don't seem to get. "Does he get it?" If he doesn't get it, he is not part of the conversation they are having about it.
The Emergent Christians are The New Christians. They are the hot lava that breaks through the old hardened crust of the earth aka prior church structures and denomationalism. The Emergent people are on the frontiers and the front lines while the rest of the Christians are defending old ground. Emergents according to Tony Jones are postmodern and post-foundationalist.
As I read through this book, while there is some understanding of the modern period and problems in the church, the author and the movement seem to lack a real sense of the history of the church. The author praises the open forum of one small gathering that allows anyone to speak. He seems to think this is an innovation but it sounds like the Brethren (except that women can speak as well.)
At the beginning of the book, Tony Jones claims victory over those who claimed God is dead. Instead, he suggests that the Church is dead. As one of my colleagues said, "If you read the New Testament, doesn't that amount to the same thing."
While I find myself resonating with much of what Tony Jones claims for the Emergent movement, there seems to be a self congratulatory spirit and naivete that comes with youth (and by that I mean a new movement) that needs to be checked.
As for me and my house, we don't mind being a bit crusty. After all, the crust of the earth is the place where people live. Lava is not good for much until it hardens and starts producing vegetation and that takes awhile.
The Emergent Christians are The New Christians. They are the hot lava that breaks through the old hardened crust of the earth aka prior church structures and denomationalism. The Emergent people are on the frontiers and the front lines while the rest of the Christians are defending old ground. Emergents according to Tony Jones are postmodern and post-foundationalist.
As I read through this book, while there is some understanding of the modern period and problems in the church, the author and the movement seem to lack a real sense of the history of the church. The author praises the open forum of one small gathering that allows anyone to speak. He seems to think this is an innovation but it sounds like the Brethren (except that women can speak as well.)
At the beginning of the book, Tony Jones claims victory over those who claimed God is dead. Instead, he suggests that the Church is dead. As one of my colleagues said, "If you read the New Testament, doesn't that amount to the same thing."
While I find myself resonating with much of what Tony Jones claims for the Emergent movement, there seems to be a self congratulatory spirit and naivete that comes with youth (and by that I mean a new movement) that needs to be checked.
As for me and my house, we don't mind being a bit crusty. After all, the crust of the earth is the place where people live. Lava is not good for much until it hardens and starts producing vegetation and that takes awhile.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)